Reviews are coming in...
...and they're a mixed bag, as reviews always are. But that mix looks rather curious to me.
On Amazon.com, I've got a review from a 37-year veteran high school science teacher, who praises my book as being "scientifically accurate." I've also heard from the reviewer at the "Lunar Library" at OutOfTheCradle.net, who tells me he thinks "the book would be great for schools." But then there was the reviewer at the National Space Society, a former NASA flight controller, who absolutely hated the book, and proceeded to write me a long diatribe pointing out all the things I got wrong. And she didn't even make it all the way through the book.
(Just as an aside, this is exactly why I decided not to be a science-fiction writer. No matter how hard you work to get all your details right, there's always someone who will come along and pick at everything you missed. It's the nature of the fandom.)
As I said, every book, movie, play, TV show, etc., gets a mix of good and bad reviews. It goes with the territory. I've always known that. Here's what strikes me as so curious, though - if my book is so riddled with inaccuracies, then why did a veteran science teacher and a major space advocate miss them? I mean, I'm giving the NSS reviewer the benefit of the doubt and not simply writing her off as a nit-picker. (She did seem inexplicably hostile toward my publisher, but like I said, I'm giving her the benefit of the doubt.)
One thing I point out in my book is in the days of the American frontier, any regular person who could hitch a horse or an ox to a wagon could head west and try to start a new life. A lot of them didn't make it, but a lot of them did, and that's how the west was won. Space isn't like that - but is it so complicated that you can't even get in the game without an advanced degree and years of experience? If so, then the "final frontier" is never going to be settled. It's simply not going to happen. There aren't enough people that smart.
Or should I not be giving the NSS reviewer the benefit of the doubt? Maybe I am being nitpicked, out of intellectual techno-snobbery or something. But if that's the case, it opens up another range of issues. If the people with the know-how try to set themselves apart from the ignorant masses, they're going to end up frustrated by the unwillingness of those ignorant masses to give them any money for space development. And once again, the final frontier never gets settled.
I'll have to discuss those ideas with my brother the Harvard PhD and my sister-in-law the Yale MD/PhD, the next time I see them.
Meanwhile, my book is what it is. I gave it my best shot. I'm thankful for everyone who likes it. And for those who don't... well, I thank them for their time and move on.
Comments